|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Promote a European Foresight Area
- Interconnect and support TF activities at European, national and
regional level, in close co-operation with all related actors in Europe
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Creating mutual learning partnerships
- between regions
- between old and new Member States, Candidate Countries & New
Neighbours
- Identification of regional typologies = challenges
|
|
5
|
- FOR-RIS Combining short term regional innovation strategies (RIS/RITTS)
initiatives with long-term time perspective of foresight initiatives
- UPGRADE Towards more knowledge based regional economies: reconversion of
regional production systems in decline
- TECHTRANS Trans-regional integration and harmonisation of technology
support mechanisms – a multi-regional response to multi-national firms
- TRANSVISION Bridging culturally close neighbouring regions separated by
national borders
- AGRIBLUE Foresight for sustainable rural economies
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Open method of co-ordination (OMC) put in practice - structural
foresight aiming at building the regional base of the European Research
and Innovation Area
- Trans-regional integration and harmonisation of technology support
mechanisms
- Technology/innovation process oriented, independent of geographical
closeness
- ”Multi-regional” response to multi-national enterprises
|
|
9
|
- Neighbouring,historically and culturally close, regions divided by
national borders building common visions of the future
- Geographical orientation (as opposed to sector/system orientation in TECHTRANS)
- Devolution of power and territorialisation of RTD policies
- Harmonisation and integration of regional support measures and RTDI infrastructure
- Building on the “Zukunftsbild – Vision d’Avenir 2020” SaarLorLux
- SeeForesighT: 1 MS, 1 Candidate Country and 1 New Neighbour State
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Conference
- dissemination of work
- mobilisation of stakeholders
- information of EU policy and instruments
- Horizontal report
- synthesis of work
- the regional context and environment
- the why? and how? of foresight
- Policy orientation paper
- recommendations to European, National and regional policymakers
|
|
12
|
- Mobilisation & awareness amongst regional stakeholders and decision
makers
- Continued cooperation of involved actors for mutual learning on a
voluntary basis
- Continuation & deepening of actions started in the framework of the
Blueprints expert group
- Initiation of new foresight actions
- Individual regions (ERDF, RIS-NAC, etc)
- Transregional cooperation (INTERREG, etc)
- Association of regional foresight labs (planning stage)
|
|
13
|
- The importance of focus on key questions and issues that foresight can
influence
- The need to mobilise key stakeholders
- The usefulness and demand for practical tools
- The willingness to engage in regional, trans-regional, or horizontal foresight
actions
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Foresight training needed: methodological quality & success of
spreading foresight in the regions linked to learning of foresight
values & methods
- Common confusion between:
- «ultimate aims» (sustainability, social cohesion, welfare of the
citizens, etc.); and
- «strategy» (to become the most competitive region, the 3 % action plan,
the ERA, etc.).
- Links between companies, research and territories are extremely
important in a transition to a knowledge-based economy
- Investments and support of EC in the process of restructuring R&D
in transition countries is crucial
- Need for permanent drivers to develop continous foresight process in
transborder areas: specific teams, agencies, networks of existing
organizations (administrations, think-tanks, etc.)
|
|
19
|
- “My work in the UPGRADE-Group was for us the basis for our “real”,
structured foresight-process. Though we made some attempts before, our
new approach, making the twenty steps of the blueprint, gives us the
chance, to improve the competitiveness of our region by bundling our
resources to a critical mass.Then we have a much better chance to fight
unemployment and migration.The discussion in the group made it possible
for me, to find out my own standpoint and develop my own idea of the
right, suitable foresight approach, to solve our specific regional
problems. Because we learned a lot from best practice examples of
regional foresight, we are now able to make the next, right steps and to
save a lot of time and money.The experience of seeing a working
programme in NE-England encouraged us, to start a region-wide
foresight-process for the whole land of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern”.
- Thilo Streit
- Forschungs- und Technologietransfer
- Kultusministerium
- Zeppelinstr., 19055 Schwerin, Germany
|